Neumind Research What is Whole Brain Learning

Neumind Research Applying Principles Whole Brain Learning to Parenting

Neumind Research Theory of Whole Brain

Neumind Research Whole Brain Principles Applied in Learning


 

 

Author Dr Mary Johnson Gerard    
Editor Gan Ee Bee    
Copy Editor Elizabeth Tan    
Page Designer Benjamin Goh    
Illustrator Helen Healey    
Publisher Neumind International Pte Ltd   

Follow Me

Research and Development

Whole Brain Principles Applied to English, Math and Science

 

 

 b01You may be asking yourself…what does whole-brain teaching look like and what are its benefits?  These are good questions and to begin with let’s look at a definition of whole-brain teaching - an instructional methodology arising from neurolinguistic research. Neurolinguistics is the study of the mechanisms of the human brain that support the development of comprehension, production and abstract knowledge of language - spoken, signed or written.

As you have learned from previous readings on neuroscience and cognitive science, the brain is an integrative organ and uses many interrelated parts to make meaning. Even though neurolinguistics – whole-brain - learning is about how the brain processes language, the process of language development is critical for learning.  Learning in all academic content areas requires the ability to use and understand language.

A couple of interesting pieces of information about neurolingusitcs are:

Neumind Research1) within the integrated brain - both left and right hemisphere’s working together - the functions of one hemisphere are instantly accessible to the other hemisphere and

Neumind Research2) this integration, or working together of the two hemisphere’s of the brain, makes language learning more balanced.

The whole-brain teaching technique called active learning relies on providing students instruction that facilitates making connections that tap both hemispheres. In addition, whole-brain instruction focuses on teaching students how to manage their emotions while learning in order to reduce the amount of downshifting their brain does when stressed. 

An earlier Neumind article describes how, when a student is stressed, their brain shifts from the neocortex of the brain to the limbic system (emotional brain) to deal with the stress.  When this happens, a student’s ability to learn is reduced and if the stress is perceived as “danger”, learning can stop completely.  Teachers provide classroom supports to reduce the potential for downshifting using such techniques as offering clear precise and realistic information about the difficulty level of the learning task and creating a calming, peaceful environment that is free of distraction and which supports learning.

One of the main principles of whole-brain learning is the “imaging” or creation of a picture in the “minds eye” about what is being taught.  Visualizing, drawing and role playing are often encouraged during the learning process because these techniques are known to help students retain and understand information better. In traditional classroom instruction, the use of these facilitative techniques is often minimal.

In conjunction with providing techniques to enhance whole-brain learning teachers also consider the types of curriculum they implement and they provide a holistic approach to learning that includes opportunities for immersion in the arts, creativity and applying skills in imagination and synthesis.  Words that describe the synthesizing process are:  adapt, anticipate, categorize, combine etc.

 

 

Teachers who are interested in fostering whole-brain learning conscientiously incorporate right-brain instructional activities such as finding patterns, using and creating metaphors and analogies and providing opportunities to visualize what they are teaching.  They will apply these techniques especially to the left-brain activities such as reading, calculation and analysis.

Holding to the principles of whole-brain instruction requires schools to rethink assessment and begin to do it differently.  Traditionally, academic assessment has been prejudiced toward the left hemisphere. Paper pencil, rote memorization of facts and information tests do not allow students to apply the strengths of the right hemisphere and in effect, compromise their performance.

Given the information in the article thus far, it seems logical to say that the teaching of language, math and science has to take into account the integrated brain and requires teachers to think differently about lesson planning, instruction and evaluation.  To take this thought a bit further, it may mean the integration of academic content as well.

A wise person once said, "If the brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't." Dividing academic subjects into specialized curriculum takes away from the brain what research is showing is its forte--integrating and making connections. 

The plain and simple truth is that student’s lives, and adult lives for that matter, outside of school, are not compartmentalized into tidy schedules of activities called art, music, science, mathematics, reading, writing, social studies, recess etc. When a child is faced with a problem inside or outside of the classroom, she has to solve it by integrating all of the information she knows and most likely the solution will be a combination of information gathered from different areas of knowing.

Theorists have been arguing for many centuries about the best way to teach content knowledge and many times the argument leads to the position that skills and values are most effectively taught within meaningful contexts.  For example, the proponents of teaching with meaningful contexts would say that in the case of making change, it would best be taught by making change in a real life situation, not on a worksheet. 

The concept of writing whole-brain, integrated lesson plans means teachers look across all subject matter content when teaching a concept and do not teach it in isolation. The following is a sample lesson plan for teaching primary school students about making change.

 

 


Neumind and Whole Brain LearningGoal:
Students know how much change they should receive when they go shopping at the grocery store.

Day of Week: Monday

Language

Math

Science

Art

Social Studies

Write a story to teach a younger child about the names of coins.

Making Change game – Teams vie for prize

Watch a movie about how coins are made

Make a collage of money other countries use.

Read Story about ancient forma of money

Using an integrated curricular approach to instruction flows naturally and provides instruction in the way the brain processes best – both sides, or hemispheres, working in an integrated fashion. The integrated teaching approach is effective when implementing the principles of multiple intelligences as it provides students with a variety of different ways to learn content. Neumind implements not only the whole-brain model but also multiple intelligences and this is a superb integration of research with instructional practices.

 

Resources
Michael, Gazzaniga. The Split-Brain revisited. 2002.
http://courses.dce.harvard.edu/~phils4/splitbrain.pdf#search='severed corpus callosum
Singh, Harnam and O’Boyl, Michael. The Brain’s Left and Right Sides Seem to Work Together Better in Mathematically Gifted. 2004. Middle-School Youth.  http://www.apa.org/releases/interhemispheric.html
Left and Right Brain Working Together.
http://www.brainskills.co.uk/LeftAndRightBrainWorkingTogether.html
Left Right Hemisphere –Which Side are You?
http://brain.web-us.com/brain/LRBrain.html
Left or Right Brain? http://www.angelfire.com/wi/2brains/
Warnod, Helen, Integrated Curriculum: Designing Curriculum in the Immersion Classroom. 2002.
http://www.archeworks.org/projects/tcsp/ic_guide.html